better platform for virtualization

[Gilad Ben-Yossef]

Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:

> Jonathan Ben Avraham <yba at tkos.co.il> writes:
>
>   
>> Hi Gilad,
>> Why do you recommend KVM over XEN? Have you fiddled with both? Are
>> there particular problems with XEN?
>>     
>
> Apart from the fact that XEN is paravirtualization technology and
> running a mission-critical Windows DomU is possible mostly in theory?
>   
Actually, I don't think this is true. Xen 2.0 supports VT extensions 
based virtualozation, so Xen is as capable as running Windows hosts as 
is KVM.

I just think it is complicated.

Gilad



-- 
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker & CTO
Codefidence Ltd.

Web:   http://codefidence.com
Cell:  +972-52-8260388
Skype: gilad_codefidence
Tel:   +972-8-9316883 ext. 201
Fax:   +972-8-9316884
Email: gilad at codefidence.com

Check out our Open Source technology and training blog - http://tuxology.net

	"That is not dead which can eternal lie.
	 And with strange aeons even death may die."

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/attachments/20100120/c33f20f9/attachment.html>