<p>Kvm lite is not very interesting.</p>
<p>As for VirtualBox - if you want to run one VM, especially if you are on win or mac, virtualbox is really cool.</p>
<p>Whenthe amount of VMs is measured in tens, id use KVM.</p>
<p>Gilad</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">
<p style="margin-bottom:0cm;margin-top:0pt">Amos Shapira wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>2009/9/16 Arie Skliarouk <a href="mailto:skliarie@gmail.com" target="_blank"><skliarie@gmail.com></a>:
</pre>
<pre>
Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 at work and am pretty excited that
RH 5.4 is out with KVM "preview tech", I'm not an expert but got the
impression that KVM might get things better than Xen eventually.
</pre>
</blockquote><p><font color="#500050">
>
> Don't mean to dis Xen or anyone, but...
>
> You can drop the "eventually". KVM rocks :-)
>
</font></p>
Gilad<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</p>