<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Gilad,<br>
<br>
Have you heard of KVM-lite ? (KVM that doesn't require virtualization
features from processor)<br>
<br>
In what sense "KVM rocks", do we have any benchmark of KVM versus
VirtualBox ?<br>
<br>
I saw a post from Ingo Molnar stating that context number of context
switches in KVM reduced dramatically with adoption of VT-d in Intel
processor, and I still wonder how to measure this.<br>
<br>
Shana tova le kulam !!<br>
<br>
Lev<br>
<br>
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4AB0D3F8.3020804@codefidence.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;">Amos Shapira wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote
cite="mid:9c2cca270909151424u58f63059x81e45b801a885edf@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2009/9/16 Arie Skliarouk <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:skliarie@gmail.com"><skliarie@gmail.com></a>:
</pre>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 at work and am pretty excited that
RH 5.4 is out with KVM "preview tech", I'm not an expert but got the
impression that KVM might get things better than Xen eventually.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Don't mean to dis Xen or anyone, but...<br>
<br>
You can drop the "eventually". KVM rocks :-)<br>
<br>
Gilad<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>