<div dir="ltr">Once they were ok. I think they started to apply QoS. <br><br>I used lftp. lftp is a very smart client. If the connection was stopped, it tries to reconnect and resume the transfer automatically. I saw connection reset and I didn't do anything (i don't recall the exact error. but it was something like the client stopped the transfer) . So, I understood who did the reset on my behalf. <br>
<br>If you can try with lftp some transfers, it would be nice to compare. <br><br>I am also connected to hot->bezeqint. <br><br>I have some issues with gtalk and voice. I talk and hear and at some point I don't hear anything. Wireshark shows destination unreachable (port unreachable). I use the program gtalx.<br>
<br>gtalx has some bugs, but i am not sure if it's the program faulty or it's hot/bezeqint fault. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Maxim Veksler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:maxim@vekslers.org">maxim@vekslers.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="ltr">I'm also getting lousy traffic from Bezeqint at home.<div><br></div><div>
I was sure it was on my side, so I haven't dug into it yet but now I see it's a cross client issue. </div><div><br></div><div>
I'm connected with hot->bezeqint. Download 2.5/ Upload 128 (or something in this range), center of Tel Aviv (<a href="http://goo.gl/maps/pIbG" target="_blank">http://goo.gl/maps/pIbG</a>).</div><div><br></div><div>
I will test today a 10mb file download from: Akamai, cloudfront, s3 which are all super fast and from a server in us-east and eu-west and will report the results.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I really hope that this is a temporarily bug in bezeqint routing instead of a new policy, I chose them exactly because they have a good reputation of not doing this sort of stuff.</div><div><br><br></div>
<div>Maxim.</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/14 sara fink <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sara.fink@gmail.com" target="_blank">sara.fink@gmail.com</a>></span><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr">I also have problems with bezeqint. I tried ftp from holland. Unencrypted the speed was around 5k/s, encrypted less than 1k/s. <br><br>worse than that I tried tunneling via a good site (speed guaranteed) and even this didn't work well. <br>
<br>Transfer from israel has excellent speed. Other than that, nothing. My conclusion is that they started to apply QOS and other dirty tricks which I noticed via wireshark. <br><br>I would suggest few things:<br>1. try to download the same rpm from other sites and compare. and then call them and show them it's impossible to get such low speed from 4-5 different sites. <br>
2. In cases where you can change ports, try to revert to high end ports.<br>3. Try https. Maybe you will get lucky. In my case it didn't help. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/14 shimi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:linux-il@shimi.net" target="_blank">linux-il@shimi.net</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div><div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Shlomi Fish <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:shlomif@iglu.org.il" target="_blank">shlomif@iglu.org.il</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>On Wednesday 13 October 2010 23:04:55 geoffrey mendelson wrote:<br>
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:<br>
> > Can anyone help me shed any light on this problem?<br>
><br>
> Traffic shaping? Did you try it at 6am or 1am?<br>
<br>
</div>No, I did not. I'm usually not awake at 6am, and usually go to bed before 1am.<br>
Are there traffic shaping schemes that limit the speed on a single TCP<br>
connection and not the entire bandwidth? (Which in prozilla's case may consist<br>
of several connections to the same host.)<br>
<div><br><br></div></blockquote></div><div><br>QoS products today can do any combination you can think of. <br><br>Side of testing and seeing for yourself, you really can't know. (usually the QoS policy is not equal to all users, and the choice of users ISPs apply different QoS rules on is voodoo at best...)<br>
<br>You don't really need 6am, 10am is also OK to verify such thing.<br><br>Might be a new policy to convert everyone to "Private NGN" so they pay a few more shekels? :) (other ISPs did it in the past so you'll add money to join the "gamers" package. a.k.a. "the we screw you less with out QoS" package...)<br>
<br>-- Shimi <br></div></div><br></div>
<br></div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
Linux-il mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il" target="_blank">Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il" target="_blank">http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Linux-il mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il" target="_blank">Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il" target="_blank">http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div></div><br></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>