<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html style="direction: ltr;">
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<style>body p { margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt; } </style>
</head>
<body style="direction: ltr;" bidimailui-charset-is-forced="true"
bidimailui-detected-decoding-type="UTF-8" bgcolor="#ffffff"
text="#000000">
On 16/01/11 22:50, Dotan Cohen wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTinqEUnugTUGYC5ER751qCjN1CoKowxUkQMcBytu@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 22:18, Shachar Shemesh <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:shachar@shemesh.biz"><shachar@shemesh.biz></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The best way to get your feedback considered by the committee
(before reaching the public comments stage, that is) is by <big><big><big><big><b>reading all the
comments</b></big></big></big></big> on the blog post Tzafrir pointed to, and then, if what you said is
not redundant to what was already said, leave a comment with it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Hi Shachar. I notice that the RLM and LRM are not implemented in the
new keyboard layout. You might want to mention to the rest of the
committee that there exist users who use the lyx layout specifically
for those two most useful characters. Please, do not remove them!
Additionally, I would love to see the inclusion of the RTL (U+200F)
and LTR (U+200E) characters. In my opinion, the RLM and LRM could go
in place of the mostly-useless [ and ] keys, and the RTL and LTR could
go on the shifted version of those same keys. Those keys are only
really useful for programming, an activity that one does not do in the
Hebrew layout.
Thanks!
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting Ltd.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.lingnu.com">http://www.lingnu.com</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>