<html style="direction: ltr;">
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<style>body p { margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt; } </style>
</head>
<body bidimailui-detected-decoding-type="UTF-8" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"
text="#000000">
<p>On 08/18/2011 09:06 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAKDXFkOFXDLOgNhShowcayeuUAeBTxK4MJNFCsN0gnAJ8ZGn2A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 18:12, Shachar Shemesh <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:shachar@shemesh.biz"><shachar@shemesh.biz></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> I
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">didn't assume anything, all the facts that I mention are referred to
here (your site):
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.lingnu.com/en/howto/78-si1452.html">http://www.lingnu.com/en/howto/78-si1452.html</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
As for the actual criticism, when you've shown that you understood WHY
the decisions were taken (documented in my blog), then you can make
constructive suggestions how to make it better. Until then, you are just
a joker who throws stones from afar.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Fair enough. I do appreciate your team's efforts, even if I don't
agree with the outcome. Your previous post explaining why RLM and LRM
were not included was very clear,</pre>
</blockquote>
Was it? They are right there, AltGr+9 and AltGr+0. It's the other
ones, RLE, LRE, RLO, LRO and PDF that were not included.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAKDXFkOFXDLOgNhShowcayeuUAeBTxK4MJNFCsN0gnAJ8ZGn2A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Where can I read the explanations? Would you mind
CCing Shai with my
contact info? Thanks.
</blockquote>
</p>
<p>BCCed. The explanation is in my blog, too. Read the comments on
the posts at <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blog.shemesh.biz/?s=1452">http://blog.shemesh.biz/?s=1452</a>
</p>
<p>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAKDXFkOFXDLOgNhShowcayeuUAeBTxK4MJNFCsN0gnAJ8ZGn2A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
I'm interested in being a productive participant. If I should make a
good case for including the RLM and LRM, incluuding the places to plut
them on the keyboard, to whom should I address it?</pre>
</blockquote>
No one. They are, already, included. If, however, you have
criticism about something not in the proposed standard (or
something that you feel should not be in the standard and is), my
blog is the best place. If you feel you disagree with me about my
answers, I believe we will be able to arrange for an invite to the
next meeting as well. In any case, as soon as the standard's text
is finalized and gone past editing, it will be published for
community review (the official part). At that point you will be
able to file objections and comments formally. Like I said before,
I intend to try and change the "no touching level 2" decision
myself at that point.</p>
<p> [1] How to say דוקא in English?</p>
<p>The word "spite" comes to mind, despite not meaning exactly the
same thing in the context you were using it. Morphix
(<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://morfix.mako.co.il/default.aspx?q=%D7%93%D7%95%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%90&source=milon">http://morfix.mako.co.il/default.aspx?q=%D7%93%D7%95%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%90&source=milon</a>)
has no better suggestions (or, for that matter, any relevant
suggestions at all).<br>
</p>
<p>Shachar<br>
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting Ltd.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.lingnu.com">http://www.lingnu.com</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>