<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pub@goldshmidt.org" target="_blank">pub@goldshmidt.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><br></div>
I'd say that it is up to Intel to prove that their TRNG design is<br>
truly non-deterministic.</blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Um, but in Intel's case, they at least <i>tried</i> to prove that their TRNG is good enough. I don't think WD tries to make its seek times very random, and a good source for random numbers, neither will they measure its entropy...</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>So if I had to put my money on a source for randomness, I would go for Intel's...</div></div></div></div>