<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hetz@hetz.biz" target="_blank">hetz@hetz.biz</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);border-right:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex;padding-right:1ex">
<div dir="rtl"><div dir="ltr">Shimi, 2013-c2 updates (available for centos 5.x/rhel 5.x) should be sufficient too.</div><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I used the official timezone database naming convention (<a href="http://www.iana.org/time-zones">http://www.iana.org/time-zones</a>), not a specific distro.<br>
<br></div><div>And the official version where Israel's latest timezone got included, is 2013d, like I said. Source: <a href="http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz-announce/2013-July/000012.html">http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz-announce/2013-July/000012.html</a><br>
<br></div><div>I checked <a href="http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/x86_64/RPMS/tzdata-2013c-2.el5.x86_64.rpm">http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/x86_64/RPMS/tzdata-2013c-2.el5.x86_64.rpm</a> and the file does have a timestamp of a couple of days after the above announcement (unfortunately, my zdump can't read it, so I can't tell for sure what's inside...) - and if you say you have checked and it shows Oct 27th as the day we move to IST... great. Why can't RedHat/CentOS call a file originating from upstream "2013d" by a name that suggests the origin version name (if that is indeed the case), like "2013-d" (if they must add extra dashes) - is beyond me.<br>
<br></div><div>-- Shimi<br></div></div></div></div>