CALL FOR PAPERS
http://i-cav.org/2024/call-for-papers/
IMPORTANT DATES
All deadlines are AoE (Anywhere on Earth)
Paper submission: January 19, 2024
Rebuttal period: February 29 – March 3, 2024
Author notification: March 26, 2024
Artifact submission: April 8, 2024 (mandatory for tool papers)
Artifact notification: May 10, 2024
Final version due: May 19, 2024
Workshops: July 22-23, 2024
Main Conference: July 24-27, 2024
CAV AWARD
Nomination deadline: March 1, 2024
Submission site
Main submission site is https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=cav2024
SCOPE
CAV 2024 is the 36th in a series dedicated to the advancement of the theory and practice of computer-aided formal analysis methods for hardware and software systems. The conference covers the spectrum from theoretical results to concrete applications, with an emphasis on practical verification tools and the algorithms and techniques that are needed for their implementation. CAV considers it vital to continue spurring advances in hardware and software verification while expanding to new domains such as machine learning, autonomous systems, and computer security. The proceedings of the conference will be published in the Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science series. A selection of papers is expected to be invited to a special issue of Formal Methods in System Design and the Journal of the ACM.
Topics of interest include but are not limited to:
Submissions on a wide range of topics are sought, particularly ones that identify new research directions. CAV 2024 is not limited to topics discussed in previous instances of the conference. Authors concerned about the appropriateness of a topic may communicate with the conference chairs prior to submission.
CAV AWARD
The CAV award is given annually at the CAV conference for fundamental contributions to the field of Computer-Aided Verification.
CAV Award Nomination deadline: March 1st, 2024
Nominations should include a proposed citation (up to 25 words), a succinct (100-250 words) description of the contribution(s), and a detailed statement to justify the nomination. The cited contribution(s) must have been made not more recently than five years ago and not over twenty five years ago. In addition, the contribution(s) should not yet have received recognition via a major award, such as the ACM Turing or Kanellakis Awards. The nominee may have received such an award for other contributions.
For previous winners of the award, please see the main CAV award page (http://i-cav.org/cav-award/).
Nominations should be submitted by e-mail to a member of the committee. For details, please see http://i-cav.org/2024/cav-award/.
PAPER SUBMISSION
Paper submissions in CAV fall into one of the following three categories (see more information below):
Papers in all three categories must be submitted by January 19th, 2024 AoE, and should be in LNCS format. Simultaneous submission to other conferences with proceedings or submission of material that has already been published elsewhere is not allowed. The review process will include a feedback/rebuttal period where authors will have the option to respond to reviewer comments. The PC chairs may solicit further reviews after the rebuttal period.
REGULAR PAPERS
Regular papers should not exceed 18 pages in LNCS format, not counting references and appendices.
Regular papers at CAV 2024 will follow a full double blind review process, which means that author names and affiliations must be omitted from the submission. Additionally, if a submission refers to prior work done by the authors, the reference should be made in the third person. These are firm submission requirements, and any regular paper that does not conform to these requirements will be rejected without review.
We do not discourage authors to put their submission on arXiv, but we strongly encourage authors to not put the work on arXiv around (within 1 week) or shortly after (within 1 month) the submission deadline, because potential reviewers may be subscribed to receive updates on recently posted papers.
Authors can include a clearly marked appendix at the end of their submissions that is exempt from the page limit restrictions. However, the reviewers are not obliged to read the contents of these appendices. Regular papers should contain original research and sufficient detail to assess the merits and relevance of the contribution. Papers will be evaluated on the basis of a combination of correctness, technical depth, significance, novelty, clarity, and elegance.
Authors of accepted regular papers will be invited (but are not required) to submit a relevant artifact for evaluation by the artifact evaluation committee. Authors are encouraged to consult SIGPLAN’s Empirical Evaluation Guidelines when reporting on empirical results.
TOOL PAPERS
Tool papers should not exceed 10 pages, not counting references.
Tool papers should describe system and implementation aspects of a tool with a large (potential) user base (experiments not required, rehash of theory strongly discouraged). Papers describing tools that have already been presented (in any conference) will be accepted only if significant and clear enhancements to the tool are reported and implemented.
Tool papers will follow a single blind review process. They do NOT need to be anonymized.
Tool papers will be provisionally accepted based on the manuscript. Authors of provisionally accepted tool papers must submit an artifact for evaluation by the artifact evaluation committee: final acceptance is conditional on successful artifact evaluation at the “functional” level. In special cases, where an artifact cannot be submitted, the authors should contact the Artifact Evaluation chairs to find alternate modes of artifact evaluation.
INDUSTRIAL EXPERIENCE REPORTS AND CASE STUDIES
Industrial Experience Reports and Case Studies should not exceed 10 pages, not counting references.
These papers are expected to describe the use of formal methods techniques in industrial settings or in new application domains. Papers in this category do not necessarily need to present original research results but are expected to contain novel applications of formal methods techniques as well as an evaluation of these techniques in the chosen application domain. Such papers are encouraged to discuss the unique challenges of transferring research ideas to a real-world setting and reflect on any lessons learned from this technology transfer experience.
Industrial Experience Reports and Case Studies will follow a single blind review process. They do NOT need to be anonymized.
Authors of accepted Industrial Experience Reports and Case Studies will be invited (but are not required) to submit a relevant artifact for evaluation by the artifact evaluation committee.
CONTACT
For any questions please contact the PC chairs: