Israeli ISP blocking outgoing SMTP
Oleg Goldshmidt
pub at goldshmidt.org
Tue Apr 7 21:01:52 IDT 2009
Aviram Jenik <aviram at jenik.com> writes:
> Noam didn't say blocking port 25 for everyone is a good thing or
> that he likes it - just that this is what ISPs in Europe and the US
> are doing that to fight spam.
Not in my experience. That is, unless I grossly misunderstand the
problem. In my mind, this means that the problem occurs when you
configure a foreign server as your SMART_HOST while connected to the
"octal 11" Israeli ISP.
If this is _not_ the problem, please accept my apologies and ignore
the rest.
I have just returned from a trip to Europe. I sent emails, using my
laptop, from two different Western European countries, from a hotel,
from coffee shops, from occasional unidentified public Wi-Fi spot,
etc. Presumably several different ISPs were involved, though I never
bothered to make a list.
Now, my laptop runs sendmail and has SMART_HOST configured to be my
Israeli ISP's mail server. Thus, when I send an email from abroad, I
am in a situation analogous to someone in Israel using a US server for
outgoing SMTP traffic. Not a single email during my week-long trip
(and I had to send quite a few) bounced or was lost. To me, this means
that Western European ISPs do *not* prevent SMTP traffic reaching
servers other than theirs.
Last time I was in the US was last August, I had no problem there,
either.
In general, this does not make much sense. Imagine a typical
Windows/Outlook user who has his "outgoing mail server" (SMART_HOST
equivalent) configured to something (by his company's IT people, he
himself does not know what an "outgoing mail server" is,
etc.). Imagine this person on a trip somewhere - he does not change
his configuration, but he doesn't normally have any problems sending
email.
If the "octal 11" Israeli ISP does it it is *not* following any common
practice. Oh, and I agree it is stupid, as is blacklisting.
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | pub at goldshmidt.org
More information about the Linux-il
mailing list