The new linux-il - a few tips to get you (re)started

[Micha Feigin]

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:56:01 +0200
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm at mendelson.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:00:04PM +0200, Herouth Maoz wrote:
> 
> >I prefer it over using "reply to all" because I can then easily scan  
> >my outbox and detect which messages I sent to the list.
> 
> What bugs me is people who send emails to 4 or 5 lists and then if I reply
> to all, which normally gives a reply to the sender directly and one to the
> list, I get 3 or 4 bounce messages because I don't subscribe to those
> extra lists.
> 
> Geoff.
> 

At least the behaviour with claws mail at the moment, reply to list correctly
recognizes linux-il which is good. Previously I've sent private mails instead
of list mails a lot of times because I'm used to using reply to list for all
others and I don't remember to switch.

At least with claws mail, in addition to the list, if you have a reply to
address it also adds that to the cc field, don't know if others do the same.

On the other hand, I've noticed that there are two from fields at the moment,
one of the original poster and the other:
From linux-il-bounces at cs.huji.ac.il Wed Jan 28 18:04:20 2009

Is this intentional?