The new linux-il - a few tips to get you (re)started
Dotan Cohen
dotancohen at gmail.com
Sat Jan 31 21:46:35 IST 2009
2009/1/30 Oleg Goldshmidt <pub at goldshmidt.org>:
> Well, this whole topic is almost as old as Linux-IL, but since we are
> at it again... IMHO, the "reply-to-all to send to the list" paradigm
> is totally broken. If I send a message to a discussion mailing list
> such as Linux-IL I expect any responses to be sent to the list,
> period. If I reply to a mailing list posting I reply to the list,
> unless I have a really good reason to do something else. This has been
> the netiquette of group communications since the times of Usenet. By
> the way, the semantics means that the list should be in "To", and
> anyone else in "Cc", not the other way around. Sophisticated filtering
> rules, for instance, may treat different headers differently (see
> below).
>
This is, and still is, the only list where this is still a problem.
Only in linux-il do I see the TO and CC lines fill up.
I agree with you: Reply should go to the list. Only on Linux-IL mus I
do Reply All, and then I see "Oleg" in the To and "linux-il" in the
CC. Basackwards. I usually edit it, but sometime (like now) I'm just
lazy and leave it.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
ا-ب-ت-ث-ج-ح-خ-د-ذ-ر-ز-س-ش-ص-ض-ط-ظ-ع-غ-ف-ق-ك-ل-م-ن-ه-و-ي
А-Б-В-Г-Д-Е-Ё-Ж-З-И-Й-К-Л-М-Н-О-П-Р-С-Т-У-Ф-Х-Ц-Ч-Ш-Щ-Ъ-Ы-Ь-Э-Ю-Я
а-б-в-г-д-е-ё-ж-з-и-й-к-л-м-н-о-п-р-с-т-у-ф-х-ц-ч-ш-щ-ъ-ы-ь-э-ю-я
ä-ö-ü-ß-Ä-Ö-Ü
More information about the Linux-il
mailing list