bug in date? Correction: IDT, not IST

[e2xbegqsdyt21hfc]

 Correction: IDT, not IST

--- On Fri, 3/27/09, e2xbegqsdyt21hfc <e2xbegqsdyt21hfc at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Due to IST, there was no such time as "27 MAR 2009 02:54:00".
         ^
         IDT

> $ date -s "27 MAR 2009 02:14:00"
> date: invalid date `27 MAR 2009 02:14:00'
> $ date -s "27 MAR 2009 02:01:00"
> date: invalid date `27 MAR 2009 02:01:00'
> 
> --- On Fri, 3/27/09, Hetz Ben Hamo <hetzbh at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Hetz Ben Hamo <hetzbh at gmail.com>
> > Subject: bug in date?
> > To: "linux-il" <linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il>
> > Date: Friday, March 27, 2009, 1:56 AM
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Take a look at this:
> > 
> > # date -s "27 MAR 2009 02:54:00"
> > date: invalid date `27 MAR 2009 02:54:00'
> > 
> > However..
> > 
> > # date -s "27 MAR 2009 03:00:00"
> > Fri Mar 27 03:00:00 IDT 2009
> > 
> > Why is it invalid??
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Hetz
> > -- 
> > Skepticism is the lazy person's default position.
> > my blog (hebrew): http://benhamo.org
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-il mailing list
> > Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il
> > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
> > 
> 
> 
>       
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-il mailing list
> Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il
> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>