Xserver question - why VESA considers monitor Virtual size is 800x600 ???

Xserver question - why VESA considers monitor Virtual size is 800x600 ???

Hetz Ben Hamo hetzbh at gmail.com
Tue May 5 13:34:55 IDT 2009


Lev,

You didn't tell me which chipset do you use (I understand it's VIA,
but which VIA?), nor distribution that you use...

You can download a driver + docs if you know what chipset in your
board (lspci -v) at this site:
http://linux.via.com.tw/support/downloadFiles.action

You can use the forum here (http://www.tkarena.com/forums/via-arena/)
which I'm sure your question has been asked before.

Thanks,
Hetz

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Lev Olshvang <levo at vboxcomm.com> wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> After hard googling I managed to set up  working setup in xorg.conf
>
> What I miss  - i did not find good explanation for  various Option and their
> affects, ( I do not deal with graphics usually), perhaps you can give me
> some reference
>
> It looks this way :
>
> Section "Monitor"
>         Identifier      "Configured Monitor"
>         Vendorname      "Plug 'n' Play"
>         Modelname       "Plug 'n' Play"
>         HorizSync    30-98
>         Option       "DPMS"
>         Option      "VBEModes"
>         VertRefresh  60-85
>         #Gamma  1.0
> EndSection
>
> Section "Screen"
>         Identifier      "Default Screen"
>         Device          "VIA"
>         Monitor         "Configured Monitor"
>         DefaultDepth    24
>         Option         "metamodes" "1280x1024_75 +0+0; 1280x1024 +0+0;
> 1024x768 +0+0; 800x600 +0+0"
> EndSection
>
>
>
>
> Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
>
> Hi Lev,
>
> Unless this is a last resort, I really recommend *NOT* to use the VESA
> driver. Vesa used the least of your grpahics chip capabilities, NO
> graphics acceleration, no nothing,
>
> Any native driver for your graphics chip would do a better job of
> allocating memory (and not giving you only 64MB RAM for your chip) and
> will detect all the resolutions. VESA most of the time don't know much
> about those resolutions because it's trying to go "wild" with 24 bit
> colors and for VESA, thats what you can get unless you fiddle with
> many parameters in xorg.conf file.
>
> Your monitor can supports multiple resolutions as shown by your log,
> but VESA is too dumb. Use the correct driver (which chip do you have?
> if you can tell me, I'll be happy to tell you which driver to use) and
> it should show all the fancy stuff.
>
> Thanks,
> Hetz
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Lev Olshvang <levo at vboxcomm.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have only two resolutions displayed by gnome-display-properties while my
> Monitor  connected to other systems definetly have more than 2 resolutions
> available.
>
>
>
>
> From the Xserver Log I got the following:
>
>
> (II) VESA(0): Total Memory: 1024 64KB banks (65536kB)
> (II) VESA(0): Configured Monitor: Using hsync range of 30.00-98.00 kHz
> (II) VESA(0): Configured Monitor: Using vrefresh range of 50.00-160.00 Hz
> (II) VESA(0): Configured Monitor: Using maximum pixel clock of 200.00 MHz
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "2048x1536" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1920x1440" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1920x1200" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1920x1080" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1600x1200" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1680x1050" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1600x1024" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1400x1050" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1280x1024" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1440x900" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1280x960" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1366x768" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1360x768" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1280x800" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1152x864" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1280x768" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1280x720" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1024x768" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1024x640" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1024x600" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1024x576" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "960x600" (width too large for virtual
> size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "1024x512" (width too large for
> virtual size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "720x576" (no mode of this name)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "853x480" (width too large for virtual
> size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "852x480" (width too large for virtual
> size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "848x480" (width too large for virtual
> size)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "720x540" (no mode of this name)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "800x480" (no mode of this name)
> (II) VESA(0): Not using built-in mode "720x480" (no mode of this name)
> (--) VESA(0): Virtual size is 800x600 (pitch 800)
> (**) VESA(0): *Built-in mode "800x600"
> (**) VESA(0):  Built-in mode "640x480"
> (**) VESA(0): Display dimensions: (320, 240) mm
> (**) VESA(0): DPI set to (63, 63)
> (II) VESA(0): Attempting to use 85Hz refresh for mode "800x600" (114)
> (II) VESA(0): Attempting to use 85Hz refresh for mode "640x480" (111)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-il mailing list
> Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il
> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Skepticism is the lazy person's default position.
my blog (hebrew): http://benhamo.org



More information about the Linux-il mailing list