Using OpenSource software in closed source componies (how ?)

Using OpenSource software in closed source componies (how ?)

Micha michf at post.tau.ac.il
Sun Nov 22 22:48:33 IST 2009


On 22/11/2009 21:30, Raz wrote:
> GPL version 1 asserts that any software as a whole combined with GPLv1
> software has to be released under the terms of GPL v1.
>

I have to admit I don't know GPL v1 too much

>
> 2009/11/22 Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad at codefidence.com
> <mailto:gilad at codefidence.com>>
>
>     Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
>
>>     Hi Boris,
>>
>>     you *CAN* use open source software with closed source application.
>>     The exception is when you're changing the source of the open
>>     source application, which means you'll need to give back the
>>     modification. I think linking to a FOSS product (GPL'd) is a bit
>>     more problematic, but for this you can write some simple wrappers.

A wrapper would still be a problem as the wrapper would also have to be GPL. 
IANAL but I think that an exception may be if you use the GPLed library as a 
sort of plugin that can be fulfilled also by other libraries. For example you 
can implement a simple inefficient proprietary library and a wrapper that allows 
using the GPLed one as well and then you are easier of with your claim.

One of the reasons that a lot of major libraries (at least those that interest 
me) us the LGPL to bypass this problem. Personally I try to stick to using 
LGPLed software to avoid any issues.

In any case, if you distribute a (L)GPLed library you need to distribute the 
source to that in any case.

>     You are wrong. Every distribution triggers the GPL. Changed source
>     code or not does not make any difference and linking to a GPLed
>     library usually (some exceptions apply) triggers the GPL if you are
>     actually distributing the library.
>

I've worked with some companies that linked/used GPLed software and also 
followed some of these arguments previously. Which way dynamic linking goes is a 
debatable issue (whether it can be considered derived work or not) and the 
subject of many a flame war. It's never been tested in court though (neither 
linking nor direct violation) so there is no precedence whether the GPL can be 
enforced.

>
>     Gilad
>
>
>     --
>     Gilad Ben-Yossef
>     Chief Coffee Drinker&  CTO
>     Codefidence Ltd.
>
>     Web:http://codefidence.com
>     Cell:  +972-52-8260388
>     Skype: gilad_codefidence
>     Tel:   +972-8-9316883 ext. 201
>     Fax:   +972-8-9316884
>     Email:gilad at codefidence.com  <mailto:gilad at codefidence.com>
>
>     Check out our Open Source technology and training blog -http://tuxology.net
>
>     	"That is not dead which can eternal lie.
>     	 And with strange aeons even death may die."
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Linux-il mailing list
>     Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il <mailto:Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il>
>     http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-il mailing list
> Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il
> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il




More information about the Linux-il mailing list