Using OpenSource software in closed source componies (how ?)
Micha
michf at post.tau.ac.il
Sun Nov 22 22:48:33 IST 2009
On 22/11/2009 21:30, Raz wrote:
> GPL version 1 asserts that any software as a whole combined with GPLv1
> software has to be released under the terms of GPL v1.
>
I have to admit I don't know GPL v1 too much
>
> 2009/11/22 Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad at codefidence.com
> <mailto:gilad at codefidence.com>>
>
> Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
>
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> you *CAN* use open source software with closed source application.
>> The exception is when you're changing the source of the open
>> source application, which means you'll need to give back the
>> modification. I think linking to a FOSS product (GPL'd) is a bit
>> more problematic, but for this you can write some simple wrappers.
A wrapper would still be a problem as the wrapper would also have to be GPL.
IANAL but I think that an exception may be if you use the GPLed library as a
sort of plugin that can be fulfilled also by other libraries. For example you
can implement a simple inefficient proprietary library and a wrapper that allows
using the GPLed one as well and then you are easier of with your claim.
One of the reasons that a lot of major libraries (at least those that interest
me) us the LGPL to bypass this problem. Personally I try to stick to using
LGPLed software to avoid any issues.
In any case, if you distribute a (L)GPLed library you need to distribute the
source to that in any case.
> You are wrong. Every distribution triggers the GPL. Changed source
> code or not does not make any difference and linking to a GPLed
> library usually (some exceptions apply) triggers the GPL if you are
> actually distributing the library.
>
I've worked with some companies that linked/used GPLed software and also
followed some of these arguments previously. Which way dynamic linking goes is a
debatable issue (whether it can be considered derived work or not) and the
subject of many a flame war. It's never been tested in court though (neither
linking nor direct violation) so there is no precedence whether the GPL can be
enforced.
>
> Gilad
>
>
> --
> Gilad Ben-Yossef
> Chief Coffee Drinker& CTO
> Codefidence Ltd.
>
> Web:http://codefidence.com
> Cell: +972-52-8260388
> Skype: gilad_codefidence
> Tel: +972-8-9316883 ext. 201
> Fax: +972-8-9316884
> Email:gilad at codefidence.com <mailto:gilad at codefidence.com>
>
> Check out our Open Source technology and training blog -http://tuxology.net
>
> "That is not dead which can eternal lie.
> And with strange aeons even death may die."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-il mailing list
> Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il <mailto:Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il>
> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-il mailing list
> Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il
> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
More information about the Linux-il
mailing list