Memory economical Linux installation?
Tzafrir Cohen
tzafrir at cohens.org.il
Sun Nov 29 08:03:43 IST 2009
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:26:56AM +0200, sara fink wrote:
> I would suggest slax.
>
> It requires much less memory.
>
> Memory
>
> · 30 MB to boot slax.
> · 64 MB to run Xwindow with fluxbox (guifast)
> · 128 MB to run Xwindow with KDE (gui or guisafe)
> http://linux.softpedia.com/get/System/Operating-Systems/Linux-Distributions/SLAX-1001.shtml
>
> Those figures are for slax to run from usb or livecd. Probably, it
> requires the same installed as well.
That is the minimal required ammount. Have you actually tried to use it?
For starters, don't waste memory on a ramdrive if you're already short
on memory.
--
Tzafrir Cohen | tzafrir at jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's
tzafrir at cohens.org.il | | best
ICQ# 16849754 | | friend
More information about the Linux-il
mailing list