ISP Suggestion

[Justin]

fine.

   - low latency in general
   - reasonably good VOIP performance
   - at least 2.5MB asymmetric
   - no QoS traffic shaping
   - absolutely no port blocking




On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo <hetzbh at gmail.com> wrote:

> Not enough info..
>
> Low latency connection to where? BBL maybe sucks in service, but they have
> the biggest pipe in IIX for example (10 Gb)  (I'm not trying to recommend
> them, I'm not their customer)..
>
> Some do not block ports, but do use QoS to shove the priority of P2P
> (torrent, emule) way down...
>
> Hetz
>
> 2009/10/26 Justin <thelonecabbage at gmail.com>
>
>>  I've been with Interal until now.  But they are merging with Bezeq Ben
>> Liumi.  I hate BBL, and more than that their quality sucks.
>>
>> Does anyone have a recommendation for a Linux friendly ISP, that doesn't
>> block ports and can provide reasonable, low latency connections?
>>
>>
>> --
>> There must be a beginning of any great matter, but the continuing unto the
>> end until it be thoroughly finished yields the true glory. -- Sir Francis
>> Drake
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-il mailing list
>> Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il
>> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Skepticism is the lazy person's default position.
> my blog (hebrew): http://benhamo.org
>



-- 
There must be a beginning of any great matter, but the continuing unto the
end until it be thoroughly finished yields the true glory. -- Sir Francis
Drake
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/attachments/20091026/efffe05d/attachment.html>