how to disable PolicyKit?
geoffrey mendelson
geoffreymendelson at gmail.com
Thu Oct 29 11:23:11 IST 2009
On Oct 29, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
>
> There must be something fundamentally wrong if GUI becomes responsible
> for security.
This is a carryover from Windows. When anti-spyware became popular,
Microsoft purchased Giant Anti Sypware, changed the name to Windows
Defender and gave it away for free to genuine windows users. Windows
Defender is fairly nice to use, it rarely does anything noticable if
you are careful about where you go on the web.
The problem with that is marketing. What good is a program you never
know you have? When Microsoft integrated Windows Defender into Windows
Vista, they made it annoying. It would often ask you for your
password, just so that you know you had it there and it was protecting
you.
It seems to me that the number two question Windows Vista users asked
when they first got the system, was "how do I get it to stop asking me
for my password".
As for a GUI being responsible for security, it scares me. My linux
boxes do things, and almost all of it is automatic, or via command
line SSH. The one box that has a monitor on it and is used in GUI mode
runs a version of MythTV, and is controlled by a remote control. Could
you imagine, putting in a DVD and being asked to enter a password? Or
accessing a network share?
While I'm all for taking the good things that Microsoft does for
Windows, re-engineering them and using them in Linux, this to me is a
non solution to a non problem, and may be sacrificing headless systems
(which make up the bulk of Linux systems currently installed) for a
possible future gain in desktop users. IMHO that will never happen
because people will never migrate from Windows to Linux if it has all
the faults of Windows, they will only migrate if they see a real gain.
Geoff.
--
geoffrey mendelson N3OWJ/4X1GM
Jerusalem Israel geoffreymendelson at gmail.com
More information about the Linux-il
mailing list