Fwd: [cc-community] Action against ACTA: Sign the petition supporting a firm, simple declaration against ACTA

[Shlomi Fish]

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: [cc-community] Action against ACTA: Sign the petition supporting a 
firm, simple 	declaration against ACTA
Date: Thursday 17 Jun 2010, 00:22:48
From: Danny Piccirillo <danny.piccirillo at member.fsf.org>
To: FSF Community Team <fsf-community-team at gnu.org>, discuss at freeculture.org, 
cc-community at lists.ibiblio.org, Gnugeneration-discuss at gnu.org, hello-
silo at googlegroups.com

Here's the petition: http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/acta/acta-declaration

And if you're on identica and reddit:
http://identi.ca/notice/36556026
http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/duplicates/cfrcj/

    *      ACTA must respect sharing and cooperation: it must do
nothing that would hinder the unremunerated noncommercial making,
copying, giving, lending, owning, using, transporting, importing or
exporting of any objects or works.
    *      ACTA must not weasel about what is commercial: no labeling
of any noncommercial activities as somehow commercial-like or treating
them as if they were commercial.
    *      ACTA must not tighten digital handcuffs: it must not hinder
any activity in regard to any product on account of its capacity to
circumvent technical measures that restrict use of copies of works of
authorship.
    *      ACTA must not interfere with individuals' noncommercial use
of the Internet (whether or not carried out using commmercial Internet
services) or undermine individuals' right or ability to connect to the
Internet.
    *      ACTA must not require anyone to collect or release any data
about individuals' use of the Internet. It must not harm privacy
rights or other human rights.
    *      ACTA must not hold the companies that implement the
Internet responsible for the substance of their customers'
communications. (For example, no punishment by disconnection, neither
explicitly required or indirectly compelled.)
    *      ACTA must not require copyright or patents, or any law
similar to one of those, to attach to any particular sort of thing or
idea.
    *      ACTA must not make any requirements about what acts
constitute civil infringement, or what acts constitute criminal
infringement, of copyright law, or patent law, or any law similar to
one of those.
    *      ACTA must not use the propaganda term "intellectual
property" or try to treat copyright law and patent law as a single
issue.
    *      ACTA must not stretch the term "counterfeiting" to apply to
copyright or patent infringement.
    *      If ACTA includes a mechanism for amendment, it must apply
these requirements to all future amendments of ACTA.

Or, as a simpler alternative,

    * Cancel ACTA entirely. Although parts of it are not
objectionable, they are secondary to ACTA's threat to our freedom.
Unless we are sure that the repressive aspects of ACTA are blocked,
the main significance of ACTA is as a threat to society. Killing ACTA
would be a fine way to get rid of this threat.


-- 
.danny

☮♥Ⓐ - http://www.google.com/profiles/danny.piccirillo
Every (in)decision matters.
_______________________________________________
cc-community mailing list
cc-community at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community

-----------------------------------------
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish       http://www.shlomifish.org/
What Makes Software Apps High Quality -  http://shlom.in/sw-quality

God considered inflicting XSLT as the tenth plague of Egypt, but then
decided against it because he thought it would be too evil.

Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - http://shlom.in/reply .