Disk I/O as a bottleneck?
guy keren
choo at actcom.co.il
Sun May 8 00:20:06 IDT 2011
On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 21:49 +0300, Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:06 PM, guy keren <choo at actcom.co.il> wrote:
>
> if you eventually decide that it is indeed disk I/O that slows
> you down,
> and if you have a lot of money to spend - you could consider
> buying an
> enterprise-grade SSD (e.g. from fusion I/O or from OCZ -
> although for
> your use-case, some of the cheaper SSDs will do) and use it
> instead of
> the hard disks. they only cost thousands of dollars for a
> 600GB SSD ;)
>
>
> Is there a reason you're recommending such an expensive drives?
> I thought some time ago to buy a "regular" 40-80Gb and install the OS
> +swap there, and have a "regular" drive around for the rest of the
> data. Is there a reason this won't work?
are you talking about using a low-end SSD?
the problem with them, is that often their throughput for sequential
operations is lower then that of normal hard disks.
or are you talking about something different?
--guy
More information about the Linux-il
mailing list