umount and data is lost?

[shimi]

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Diego <elcuco at kde.org> wrote:

> Using nand, cache is meaninless here, writing time is ... millisecs?
>
>
The actual writing time, you're probably correct. Who said the controller
does not wait for some more data to be more efficient in writing (to avoid
wear or increase write performance)? (and there are probably two
controllers here - one on your motherboard, and the one on the nand device,
which has its own algorithms and ways of doing stuff... and they're both
black boxes for you...).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/attachments/20111106/5dff9578/attachment.html>