Linux is ready for the desktop!

[Guy Tetruashvyly]

Greetings Nadav ,


    * I do agree that Linux is ready for newbie-desktop use, it is now,
      and for the purpose descried for your end-user, it has been so for
      a few years now. reminiscing my first Linux days, 4 years ago, the
      most frustrating part was " why isn't it working 5 seconds after I
      installed it ? " , so, I do agree about the part of having a
      newbie, or a seasoned Windows user not going at Linux by
      themselves for the first time.  I do agree with Oleg that an FC15
      or Ubuntu 11.04 are ready for use 1 hour tops after the first GUI
      login, ( with 2.5 Mbps downstream ) .

    * My trouble with Fedora 15 was its lack of performance on older P4
      systems, ( like the one I'm using at this moment), I suspect is
      was the Radeon 9200 that was causing the system freezes, but, I'm
      convinced it would have run fine on a newer, say core2duo and
      younger CPU's and its affiliated hardware peripherals . the same
      system is running CentOS 5.6 , 6.0 , and Ubuntu server 11.04 (
      with GUI) with now major issues. ( the Ubuntu server is using the
      On-Board Intel VGA, did not clear the time to get the Radeon to
      work smoothly on it. ( I'm fine with one monitor for now) .

    * This maybe a bit off-topic , but,  where I'm at employed
      currently, in sunny New-Mexico, as in many U.S locations,
      Microsoft has a strong hold on small business, Funny , but the
      bigger the company, the more Linux servers you'll find on-site. 
      The smaller IT firms that service those businesses find it much
      easier to have their client spend 800$ on Microsoft Server 2008 ,
      plus some more money on CAL's , and spare themselves from learning
      to deploy Linux professionally , thus liberating  themselves and
      their clients from that strong hold.    The  the business I'm
      working for is making attempts to install Linux whenever possible,
      but we can definitely feel the strong hold.   The standard U.S
      office worker is utterly dependent on Microsoft Outlook - by
      itself and by its interfaces with other industry standard
      applications.  there are secretaries / receptionists here that use
      it longer then the time I got my first PC !! ( I'm not very young,
      I got it in my early 20's ) . But , for home use, it is  a green
      light indeed.


Guy



On 09/16/2011 02:29 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> For years, people have been saying that Linux might be good for this, and
> good for that (and the list of "this" and "that" has been growing every year) -
> but Linux is *NOT* ready for the desktop and ordinary newbie users.
>
> Well, for the first time ever, I believe the situation has changed.
> Linux *IS* ready for the desktop!
>
> I have just installed a new Linux computer for my mother-in-law.
> She is the quintessential newbie - she knows hardly nothing about computers,
> doesn't want to know much about computers, and only wants to use her computer
> for a limited set of tasks, such as:
>
> 	1. Browse the web (mostly specific sites, e.g., her bank).
> 	2. Read and write email (using gmail).
> 	3. Make video calls over skype.
> 	4. Conveniently view photos of the grandkids (e.g, with Picasa).
> 	5. Play children movies for the grandkids.
> 	6. Bonus points: If I could control her computer remotely, fixing
> 	   problems and sending new photos, movies, etc., without being there.
>
> I have good news, and bad news.
>
> The good news is that, as I said, I believe Linux *is* ready for the desktop.
> I was able to build for her a Linux setup that does all of the above, and more,
> she was very pleased with the result. Interestingly, she found the "Gnome 3"
> interface very usable and understandable, despite what some pessimists have
> been saying about it recently. Perhaps Gnome 3 does show promise after all.
>
> There is some bad news, however: NEVER suggest to anyone but a Linux expert
> to install Linux on their own - in my case Fedora 15 (but please don't start
> a distro war). After I installed Fedora 15 on her new computer, I had to
> spend over 10 hours (!!) configuring it to be usable as I wanted. In
> particular, I "enjoyed" the following activities:
>
> 1. I had to install all sort of allegedly illegal software which doesn't come
>     with Fedora, but is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY for any modern user. This includes
>     mp3 playing and video playing with various codecs.
>     I didn't find Fedora's pretense that this software was somehow optional to
>     be comforting.
>
> 2. I had to install various free-as-in-beer but not free-as-in-speech software
>     that doesn't come with Fedora, like Skype, Picasa, and Flash Player plugin.
>     Because these programs aren't built specifically for Fedora, they don't
>     fit into it very well. In some cases (e.g., Picasa) I needed some dirty
>     tricks to get it to work at all.
>
> 3. I had to set up ADSL. It turns out that in 2011, the pppoe package still
>     doesn't come preinstalled, and when you do install it and set up ADSL, you
>     discover that NetworkManager has a bug that prevents it from starting the
>     connection during boot. I spent more than an hour to circumvent this bug.
>
> 4. I had to enable Hebrew - but just a bit (she's an English-speaker, so she
>     wants most of the UI in English anyway).
>
> 5. I had to find my way through bugs in the Fedora installer (which got stuck
>     while configuring the date (!)), bugs in selinux setup, bugs in the
>     pulseaudio setup (these were the worst), and other problems that should
>     never have existed in a seriously-tested distro...
>
> And probably other stuff I don't remember. But to make a long story short,
> there is absolutely no way that a beginner - or even an experienced Windows
> user - could ever do any of these things. A "Linux installation party" would
> not be enough either. And even a Linux expert (like myself) would need a
> second computer and an Internet connection to be able to solve some of the
> problems he encounters.
>
> There is only one short-term solution, and it is to do what I did: Computer
> stores can, and should, sell preinstalled Linux systems! Some computer store
> employee could spend 10 hours like I did setting up a typical Israeli setup
> on the typical computer he sells, and then offer buyers to have this OS for
> free (but with no warantee either), saving them 400-800 shekels on the price
> of the computer, a saving which is particularly significant when you consider
> that the current retail price for a newbie-oriented but feature-packed
> computer is just 1000 shekels.
>
> When 99.9% of the people were addicted to Windows, Linux was "picky about
> its friends", and the price of Windows+Office was just 20% of the computer
> price, customers might have declined this option. But today, when Windows
> isn't the only show in town (iOS and Android are everywhere) and Linux is
> more mature and user-friendly, and the price of Windows+Office is 80% of the
> hardware price, I would bet that more and more users would make this choice.
>
> So long live Linux, the new choice for desktop.
>
> P.S. Whether or not the desktop computing paradigm itself has a future at
> all, is a different question ;-) I personally think the answer is that it
> doesn't, but this is a different story. Here I was assuming that desktops
> are here to stay, at least for a while longer.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/attachments/20110916/77f746c2/attachment.html>