Preparing to convince to shift to non-propriety documents formats
Oron Peled
oron at actcom.co.il
Tue Feb 21 00:10:23 IST 2012
On Monday, 20 בFebruary 2012 22:30:54 Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Oron Peled wrote about "Re: Preparing to convince to
shift to non-propriety documents formats":
> > > Undocumented? Which file format is that? All the .doc and .docx
> > > formats are documented, even the older binary formats.
> >
> > Care to point us where it is?
> >
> > PS: if this "documentation" is encapsulated in something that
> > can only be read after signing some NDA and/or other legal
> > MS stuff -- don't bother, such documentation is equivalent
> > to internal MS documentation -- I.e: it is not usefull to
> > anyone else.
>
> Dotan gave the links earlier today:
>
> > Here are the pre-2007 formats:
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff381461.aspx
> >
> > And here are the current versions:
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc313118.aspx
>
> Amazingly, not only do you not have to sign any NDA, the documents (at
> least those I looked at) say that your are free to copy and
> redistiribute them. Perhaps even more amazingly, they are in PDF format,
I think you'll be less thrilled after reading my response to his mail.
In short:
* The documents are free, but the contained information is not.
* Their appearance (e.g: PDF, etc.) is not surprising if you know
they were released during the corrupted OOXML campaign.
--
Oron Peled Voice: +972-4-8228492
oron at actcom.co.il http://users.actcom.co.il/~oron
Q: How many NSA agents does it take to replace a lightbulb?
A: dSva7DrYiY24yeTItKyyogFXD5gRuoRqPNQ9v6WCLLywZPINlu!
More information about the Linux-il
mailing list