Python question - first call is slower?
Nadav Har'El
nyh at math.technion.ac.il
Wed Jun 20 00:27:12 IDT 2012
Hi, I have run across a puzzling issue in Python, and I wonder if anyone
on the list can explain it.
I have a python function which takes some input and produces some
output - it doesn't keep permanent state, and presumably running it
twice would do exactly the same thing twice, and take exactly the same
time.
But strangely, it doesn't - the first call takes 14 milliseconds, while
the second and all subsequent calls take only 2 milliseconds each.
Does anybody have any idea why this can happen?
I considered, and discredited, the following attempted "explanations":
1. "The extra 12 milliseconds is the time it takes to read and/or compile
the function's code". This explanation isn't true, because the code is
read and/or compiled already when I "import" the module, before I
measure the first call to the function. Moreover, if I measure parts of
this function's code, I see it becomes uniformly slow - e.g., half of
its code gets done in 6 milliseconds; It's not a 12 millisecond pause
and then the rest of the function finishes in 2ms.
2. "The code is slower the first time it runs, because only then does it
get compiled and/or optimized". As far as I know, Python doesn't do
JIT so this isn't a correct explanation...
3. "If class A imports B which imports C which imports D, some of these
classes are only read when the code is actually used for the first
time". Again, I couldn't find any evidence that this is true in Python
(unlike, e.g., Java). An "import" would read the whole class hierarchy into
memory. Right?
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Nadav.
--
Nadav Har'El | Wednesday, Jun 20 2012,
nyh at math.technion.ac.il |-----------------------------------------
Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |I am thinking about a new signature. Stay
http://nadav.harel.org.il |tuned.
More information about the Linux-il
mailing list