[OT] Any Cellphone providers have a non-NAT option

[E.S. Rosenberg]

2017-06-03 20:21 GMT+03:00 Noam Meltzer <tsnoam at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Partner are offering "real" IPv4 address for an extra fee to their business
> customers.
> I've previously set such a configuration for my parents in law and for the
> past 3.5 years it's working flawlessly AFAIK.
>
> I don't know if they offer IPv6 and the reasons for originally choosing
> Partner are non technical.
IPv6 is not a demand I just figured that if they are doing IPv6
networking the chance is higher that I'd be getting a real IP address
and I have how to route IPv6 traffic.
Will be looking into my options.
Thanks,
Eliyahu - אליהו
>
>  - Noam
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017, 01:13 E.S. Rosenberg <esr+linux-il at g.jct.ac.il> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> I was told by Bezeq that they currently don't have infrastructure
>> where I am living so I'm looking at using a cellular modem instead.
>> Ideally I'd like to have some remote access to home but if the
>> Cellular network is Carrier Grade NAT I can forget about that (unless
>> I create a reverse SSH tunnel from one of my servers which I guess can
>> be an option).
>>
>> Is any carrier offering 3/4G with real IP(v6) addresses?
>> Thanks,
>> Eliyahu - אליהו
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-il mailing list
>> Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il
>> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il