Fwd: Weird 'free' output

[Shay Gover]

Please do not assume that you can speak for the community based on an
article at Ynet.
There is no verdict in that case, not even a complaint (Checked on Nevo
now). Just a rumor and someone wealthy enough to post it on Ynet.


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Ori Idan <ori at heliconbooks.com>
Date: Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Weird 'free' output
To: Diego Iastrubni <diegoiast at gmail.com>
Cc: IGLU Mailing list <linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il>


Sorry, I am not a convicted criminal.
If you believe what is written in Yediot, that is your problem.

-- 
Ori Idan CEO Helicon Books
http://www.heliconbooks.com





On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 9:21 PM Diego Iastrubni <diegoiast at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ori,
>
> You are not welcome here. Please unsubscribe.
>
> Admins - please remove this convicted criminal from this list. This man is
> a stain on our community.
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2021, 7:53 PM Ori Idan <ori at heliconbooks.com> wrote:
>
>> Note that Linux tries to use available memory for cache, that is why free
>> memory seems small.
>>
>> --
>> Ori Idan CEO Helicon Books
>> http://www.heliconbooks.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 2:48 PM linux.il <linux.il at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Omer, thank you!
>>> Is it related to the "Inactive" count from /proc/meminfo?
>>> I used to think that available=free+cache+buffers...
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 1:19 PM Omer Zak <w1 at zak.co.il> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From man free:
>>>>
>>>> available
>>>>               Estimation of how much memory is available for starting
>>>> new applications, without swapping. Unlike the data provided  by
>>>>               the  cache  or free fields, this field takes into account
>>>> page cache and also that not all reclaimable memory slabs will
>>>>               be reclaimed due to items being in use (MemAvailable in
>>>> /proc/meminfo, available on kernels 3.14,  emulated  on  kernels
>>>>               2.6.27+, otherwise the same as free)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 13:07 +0300, linux.il wrote:
>>>> > "Available" output seems weird, or I'm missing something?
>>>> > Any ideas?
>>>> >
>>>> > TIA, Vitaly
>>>> >
>>>> > free -m
>>>> >               total        used        free      shared  buff/cache
>>>> > available
>>>> > Mem:          31654       29883         937           1         832
>>>> >     27675
>>>> > Swap:             0           0           0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> "Prior to capitalism, the way people amassed great wealth was by
>>>> looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man. Capitalism made it
>>>> possible to become wealthy by serving your fellow man." - Walter E.
>>>> Williams
>>>> My own blog is at https://tddpirate.zak.co.il/
>>>>
>>>> My opinions, as expressed in this E-mail message, are mine alone.
>>>> They do not represent the official policy of any organization with
>>>> which I may be affiliated in any way.
>>>> WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  at https://www.zak.co.il/spamwarning.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Linux-il mailing list
>>>> Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il
>>>> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-il mailing list
>>> Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il
>>> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-il mailing list
>> Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il
>> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>>
> _______________________________________________
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il at cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/attachments/20210504/1ce319bd/attachment-0001.html>