High Availability

[shimi]

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:32 AM, geoffrey mendelson <
geoffreymendelson at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Apr 15, 2010, at 7:53 AM, shimi wrote:
>
>>
>> Using Linux more than a decade, I can say that if you're competent enough
>> as a system administrator (which you should be, if you "go big" and start
>> high-availability-ing your stuff - you need to understand what you're doing)
>> - I've learned that most of the time, a downtime of a Linux system is due
>> to... hardware issues;
>>
>
>
> Obviously you have never used UBUNTU :-(
>
>
<don't let this comment become a distro war>

Sure I did; Which is why I advise to everyone that it's the
Windows-Vista-equivalent-Linux. If you want it to look nice and /think/ it
makes you cool because you got a commercial CD by mail (!!) for free (!!),
use it. If you want something useful that works - don't. Just like Vista
(and I would say "7" as well, but oh well.) :-)

"And if you ignore my advise - deal yourself with the problems that you have
in your so-called 'perfect' distro" :)

</don't let this comment become a distro war>

So yes, my motto is now: "ANY Linux! Just Not Ubuntu!"

And if anyone insists on telling me how wrong I am, please, off list, there
is no point in spamming this chewed subject :-)

Thanks,

-- Shimi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/attachments/20100415/e8287fa1/attachment.html>